Ever since class last Tuesday, I’ve
been debating whether I should change the title of my blog to “Fifty Shades of
<insert witty library pun>.” In the end, I decided the title of this post
was apt enough, as the warm-up activity and subsequent events in class
demonstrated that the intentions of the inquisitive user are very much like Mr.
Christian Grey’s appetites: enigmatic and ever-so perplexing. The main question
at the heart of class seemed to be “what does this user want?” with varying
degrees of success when attempting to answer it.
The warm-up activity at the
beginning of class started with a question from Kristin the User that was
harmless, if not oblivious: “I’m looking for books like Fifty Shades of Grey
by James. Can you recommend any?” Deliberating within my group, the potential
response to this query seemed rather risqué at first. Do we just ask the first
question that comes to our minds when Fifty Shades is brought up? Then,
we decided to tease out what about the book she enjoyed, thus providing a
pathway where we can explore different options that might suit her tastes. It
was honestly like solving a puzzle, figuring out which pieces fit where and
gaining a better idea of the whole picture once more pieces are assembled. Once
we figured out it was a Nicholas Sparks was a topic of interest, it became
easier to suggest books that fit the user’s interest, which eventually allowed
for us to close the reference interaction.
Although it may not have seemed
like it, the Fifty Shades exercise related quite significantly to the
resource guide presentations, as did the transcript analysis at the end of
class. Both the warm-up and the transcript analysis acted as bookends to a project
that essentially attempted to anticipate questions a user might ask if they
engaged a librarian in a face-to-face interaction. Instead, the resource guide
acted as a virtual substitute, presenting installed pathways that led a user to
a pre-determined solution, or at least a stepping stone to that solution. I
thought that Celia, Alyssa, and Casey’s group gave a great example of this
through their resource guide on immigration. It provided resources for many
potential questions that aspiring citizens might have, such as “what pro-bono
legal options do I have?” and “how do I avoid scams?” Anticipating the myriad
of questions a potential user group might have is a difficult endeavor, for
much like an aforementioned titular character of one of the most popular
erotica books of all time, a user’s question is not what it seems on the
surface. It contains multitudes, trapdoors that lead to nowhere, and a fair bit
of confusion as to how it relates to anything. However, the duty of any
librarian must involve taking the time to resolve the question that lies in
front of them, whether that is in the form of a dynamic reference interview or
a static resource guide.
Nice synthesis in the last paragraph! And for the readers at home, *I* wasn't looking for this; my CHARACTER was. :)
ReplyDeleteThinking about reference as a puzzle is an apt lens. Something I realized during the activity was that I actually wanted it to be a different kind of puzzle than it was, which caused a bit of a detour for me. It was a good reminder to keep the user/patron front and center rather than (selfishly) chasing something that was interesting to me.
ReplyDeleteI had not thought of the three as being related before. Now that you point it out, it seems so glaringly obvious. In both situations, library professionals are trying to connect users with resources. The guide being more proactive instead of the reactive nature of the reference interview. I think you summed it up nicely when you said that the resource guide tried to "anticipate" the queries users might have. This concept of viewing the guides was an anticipation of library user needs seems so clear that I wonder why I hadn't noticed it before. Stellar observation, R!
ReplyDeleteI also thoroughly enjoy your blog post title!
ReplyDeleteYay puzzles! More of the logic nature than the traditional piecing together in my mind before reading this post, now sees R.A. as having a blank puzzle that you don't know the pieces to yet. Each question gains you another piece, until you have the full picture. It is a more subtle and nuanced view of R.A. that you elicited in your post than I had fully realized before. Really great discussion of how all three relate in a single class. Wonderful job :)
ReplyDelete